COP 3330 Object Oriented Programming
| Question # 40088 | Computer Science | 6 years ago |
|---|
| $10 |
|---|
Research Paper
Sunday, July 3, 2016 for 100% credit
Monday, July 4, 2016 for 90% credit
Tuesday, July 5, 2016 for 80% credit
Wednesday, July 6, 2016 for 70% credit
Paper description
Write a minimum three page paper that compares and contrasts two object oriented programming languages. Be sure to cover the following:
Paper Section
Percent
Description of object-oriented programming
5
Description and background of an object oriented programming language
20
Description and background of another object oriented programming language
20
Discuss similarities of the two languages
20
Discuss differences of the two languages
20
References (cannot use unpublished articles from Internet, at least use Google Scholar)
5
Format: double-spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, title page
10
Total
100
Paper format
The paper shall comprise to following components
Title page, centered vertically and horizontally
Course number and name: “COP 3330 Object Oriented Programming”
Student name: “FirstName LastName”
Student PID: “PID”
Date: “Month Day, Year”
Body of the paper
Introduction
Description and background of an object oriented programming language
Description and background of an object oriented programming language
Discuss similarities of the two languages. Bullet statements or tables are not acceptable.
Discuss differences of the two languages. Bullet statements or tables are not acceptable.
Conclusion
Reference list
At least two scholarly references.
APA format, example
Solow, Brian K,M.D., F.A.A.F.P. (2010). Your good name: Protecting yourself from physician identity theft. Physician Executive, 36(3), 30-3.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
Formatting
Title page
Minimum 3 pages of content
Double-spaced
12 point Times New Roman font
References
Academic Honesty
Any occurrence of academic dishonesty (including, but not limited to, cheating, copying, plagiarism, etc…) with respect to any exam, paper, or assignment will result in a grade of F, followed by the documented procedures for dealing with such behavior as described in the UCF Golden Rule: A Handbook for Students.
In this course we may utilize turnitin.com, an automated system which instructors can use to quickly and easily compare each student's assignment with billions of web sites, as well as an enormous database of student papers that grows with each submission. After the assignment is processed, as an instructor I receive a report from turnitin.com that states if and how another author’s work was used in the assignment. For a more detailed look at this process, visit http://www.turnitin.com.
Attachments:
