L7 Project and
Organisational Strategy: Individual presentation, 100%
Key Details and Requirements
11 May 2023, no later than 16:30pm (GMT)
Understand how organisations deliver their strategic
objectives through projects.
Understand the different approaches to project design and the
situations where these approaches are more (or less) relevant.
3. Examine rationales behind
variation in project management owing to organisational factors – with sectors
4. Be able to evaluate
situation and need contingencies that impact organisational strategy and
consequences of the same for project management.
presentation slides submission, 100%
Referencing: Students are expected to
use Harvard Referencing throughout their assignments where required. Please
follow the Harvard Referencing Handbook for all your assignments
at the ULBS.
Submission Method: Turnitin - Your work
needs to be put through Turnitin. All submissions will be electronically
checked for plagiarism.
You have the option
to upload your work ahead of the deadline, ULBS will be reviewing
your last submission only.
be used for late submissions. In such case, you should send your work
to *This Text is Removed by Studyfull for Privacy & Security Purposes*
If you experience
issues when uploading your work, please email it by the deadline to *This Text is Removed by Studyfull for Privacy & Security Purposes*
Choose an organisation and map its ‘project orientation’ from the 1.
project portfolio perspective and 2. organisational perspective. You need to
provide examples of at least 5 projects (in total) to substantiate your mapping
on 1 and 2. You should provide a
power point of no more than 10 slides and no more than 2000 words on these 10
slides excluding any references (1 slide) and Cover slide (together 1 slide)
The suggested outline is (this is not binding – and spare space you can
use the way you want to add analysis / enhanced the assignment)
Slide 1: Cover slide;
Slide 2: Organisation profile
with relevance to projects
Slide 3: Organisational
perspective on project orientation- mapped Slide 4/5: Support for the
perspective using 5 projects at least
Slide 6: Project portfolio
perspective on project orientation- mapped
Slide 7/8: Support for the
perspective using at least 5 projects (could be the same as above projects or
Slide 9: Discuss implications
and concerns re: organisational strategy for doing projects.
Slide 10: Recommendations
Module Assessment Criteria
Illustrates an excellent level of
understanding of complex issues in the subject. All requirements of the work
are dealt with to a high standard and the work is free from all but isolated
minor errors. The material is wholly relevant to the tasks.
Excellent analysis, synthesis and critical
reflection with the ability to tackle issues and questions not previously
Evidence of independent and original
judgment in relation to the resolution of the client’s needs and problems.
Excellently presented in terms of structure and professional style
Illustrates a very good
understanding of the issues in the subject, some of which are likely to be
complex with some independent critical thought appropriate to the tasks. Most
of the requirements of the work are covered with only a few gaps or minor and
inconsequential errors. The material is largely relevant to the tasks and there is a good attempt at
analysis, synthesis and critical reflection with evidence of some ability to
tackle issues not previously encountered. The work is presented in a clear
manner with only minor spelling and grammatical errors.
The work displays good
knowledge and understanding and its relevance to the task. The submission
exhibits clear analysis and reasonable use of grammar, spelling and language. It may contain errors and lack fluency.
Limited evidence of the ability to
sustain a relevant
argument or logical reasoning.
50 – 59%
an unsatisfactory grasp of the issues in the subject. Primarily descriptive
and lacking in independent critical thought appropriate to the tasks.
Weak or no attempt at analysis, synthesis and critical reflection with
little evidence of ability to tackle issues not previously encountered. Poor
spelling or other grammatical errors.
0 - 49%