draft copy 4-5 slides CW3 - Digital Presentation of the Findings, Analysis
| Question # 48616 | Writing | 1 year ago |
|---|
| $10 |
|---|
CW3 - Digital Presentation of the Findings, Analysis and Conclusion (50%)
Coursework Brief
Information
Description
Assignment Type / Format
Digital Presentation
Assignment Weight
50 % of Module / Coursework
Assignment Title
Digital Presentation of your 'Research findings, analysis and conclusion'
Instructions / Requirements
Assignment issued subject to Internal Moderation
You are required to make a pre-recorded digital presentation of your 'Research findings, analysis and conclusion'
You will give a 20-minute Power Point type presentation that your Project Tutor can view on a suitable format such as PowerPoint.
We must be able to see your face and hear your words on the video you upload. If we cannot see your face or hear your voice your submission will be rejected.
You should not read from a script, nor should you read directly from the slides. You should instead talk your audience through your data and arguments clearly and coherently.
The assessment must use the format in the attached document Student Template - CW4.pptx. There are guides to help you display primary data CW4 Template Primary - qual and quant guidance.pptx and secondary data CW4 Template Secondary - qual and quant guidance-1.pptx .
PLEASE USE THESE GUIDES WHEN ADAPTING THE TEMPLATE TO YOUR PROJECT.
If the work does not follow this format and if the sources of your data are not clear and verifiable your work will not be assessed. Please note all figures, illustrations, data, statistics, theories and ideas must be referenced. Please include the author name, year of publication and page reference. If your work includes primary data, you must include copies of your ethics documentation including your ethics protocol number and a sample of your data. This is necessary to ensure that fake referencing and falsification is prevented. Please note that any transgressions will be reported for Academic Misconduct.
Help is available to understand how to produce this from workshop four on 20th July 2023, in your AEB session and the CASE summer support on creating a presentation.
Please pay particular attention to how you display your data and ensure that you have analysed it and that you effectively link your data to answering your research questions / aims / objectives.
To complete this assignment please:
1. Develop your knowledge through workshop 4 on 20th July 2023.
2. Watch examples from previous students
3. Familiarise yourself with the presentation template and attend AEB sessions.
5. Use the 'dissertation' drop-in sessions with CASE to review your work and referencing sessions to check your referencing. The timetable can be found here: (https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6296006?module_item_id=2792572 )
Please then submit:
A copy of your slides and
A presentation document titled 'Video Presentation_1XXXXXXX'
Please ensure you upload all ethics forms and a reference list
Please note: as these videos can take time to upload we would recommend that you attempt to upload at least 4 hours prior to the deadline. When you are uploading your video you are agreeing to the following:
Learning Outcomes
Evaluate the connection between theory, empirical data and their own research findings
Recommend findings that have implications for policy or practice in the relevant field of study
Marking Scheme
Introduction (10%)
Display of data - Evidence of Research and Quality of content/ analysis/ evaluation (35%)
Discussion, conclusion (and recommendations if appropriate) (35%)
Structure (10%)
Communication and presentation skills (10%
Marking Criteria
PG Grading Criteria for 7BUS 1357 Pre-recorded Presentation including Personal Reflection - CB_092022.docx
Help & Feedback
Performance will be assessed using HBS Grading Criteria and Mark scheme
Your Project Tutor will provide feedback in writing on the StudyNet within 4 weeks of submission. Grades will be deducted if the assignment is plagiarised, over word count, late or missing*
For further help, contact your module leader in their drop-in hours or by email to *This Text is Removed by Studyfull for Privacy & Security Purposes* or *This Text is Removed by Studyfull for Privacy & Security Purposes*
Go to CASE workshops, use the CASE website and drop-in hours https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6296006?module_item_id=2792572
View the CASE workshop timetable on the CASE main website page for details on when to attend or book a slot with a dedicated advisor
HBS Coursework Support
Academic English for Business support is available through Siegrid Beck from the CASE office. See the AEB schedule for support sessions.
What happens during marking?
* For each day or part day up to five days after the published deadline, coursework submitted late will have the numeric grade reduced by 10 grade points until or unless the numeric grade reaches 40 for levels 4, 5 and 6 or 50 for level 7 (PG). Where the numeric grade awarded for the assessment is less than 40 for level 4, 5 and 6, or 50 for level 7, no lateness penalty will be applied. However, if a submission is more than 5 working days after the published deadline, a grade of zero will be awarded.
View Rubric
CW4
Criteria
Ratings
Points
Set the scene (Introduction) [10%]
10 pts
Outstanding
Displays outstanding knowledge & understanding of the research topic including clear identification of research question, aims and objectives. Correct and outstandingly justified application of the research methodology
8.5 pts
Excellent
Displays excellent knowledge & understanding of the research topic including clear identification of research question, aims and objectives Correct and excellently justified application of the research methodology
7.5 pts
Very good
Displays very good knowledge & understanding of the research topic including clear identification of research question, aims and objectives. Correct and very well justified application of the research methodology
6.5 pts
Good
Displays good knowledge & understanding of the research topic including clear identification of research question, aims and objectives Correct and well justified application of the research methodology
5.5 pts
Clear pass
Displays satisfactory knowledge & understanding of the research topic including some identification of research question, aims and objectives Correct and satisfactorily justified application of the research methodology
4.5 pts
Marginal fail
Displays less than satisfactory knowledge & understanding of the research topic with no identification of research question, aims and objectives Limited justification application of the research methodology Not uploaded in correct format. Before resubmission please refer to the templates for presentation to ensure you have covered all the requirements
3 pts
Clear fail
Displays less than satisfactory knowledge & understanding of the research topic. No identification of research question, aims and objectives Very No justification of the application of the research methodology. Not uploaded in correct format. You must book a 121 support session with CASE brining this feedback with you: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
1 pts
Nothing of merit
Displays no evidence knowledge & understanding of the research topic including very little identification of research question, aims and objectives Does not justify application of the research methodology Not uploaded in correct format. You must book a 121 support session with CASE, brining this feedback with you: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
/ 10 pts
Display of data - Evidence of Research and Quality of content/ analysis/ evaluation [35%]
35 pts
Outstanding
Outstanding display of validated data which relates well to the topic/question. The implications of data set outstandingly explored, such as shortcomings or strengths. Outstanding analysis of data demonstrating an understanding of how data sets can be brought together to create new knowledge. No errors / omissions in content/calculations.
29.75 pts
Excellent
Excellent display of validated data which relates well to the topic/question. The implications of data set excellently explored, such as shortcomings or strengths. Excellent analysis of data demonstrating an understanding of how data sets can be brought together to create new knowledge. No errors / omissions in content/calculations.
26.25 pts
Very Good
Very good display of validated data which relates well to the topic/question. The implications of data set presented, such as shortcomings or strengths. Very good analysis of data demonstrating an understanding of how data sets can be brought together to create new knowledge. Minor errors / omissions in content/calculations.
22.75 pts
Good
Good display of validated data which relates well to the topic/question. Some of the implications of data set presented, such as shortcomings or strengths. Good analysis of data demonstrating an understanding of how data sets can be brought together to create new knowledge. Few errors / omissions in content/calculations
19.25 pts
Clear pass
Satisfactory display of validated data which relates well to the topic/question. Some of the implications of data set presented, such as shortcomings or strengths. Satisfactory analysis of data demonstrating an understanding of how data sets can be brought together to create new knowledge. Errors or omissions in content/calculations. To develop your work the following guide may be of assistance: https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-is-data-analysis-with-examples
15.75 pts
Marginal fail
Data display has not been validated and does not relate well to the topic/question. None of the implications of data set presented, such as shortcomings or strengths. Very limited analysis of data demonstrating little understanding of how data sets can be brought together to create new knowledge. Errors / omissions in content/calculations. Please ensure you upload using the correct format before resubmission. To develop your work the following guide may be of assistance: https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-is-data-analysis-with-examples
10.5 pts
Clear fail
Data not validated. Lacking in adequate content/ knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes. Lack justification for the research methodology and inappropriate research methods applied. You must book a 121 support session with CASE bringing with you this feedback: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
3.5 pts
Nothing of merit
Incorrect format Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated. Content irrelevant / not appropriate to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes. ou must book a 121 support session with CASE, brining this feedback with you: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
/ 35 pts
Discuss and conclude - Analysis /Critical evaluation/ Discusses recommendations [35%]
35 pts
Outstanding
Outstanding level of discussion and critical evaluation. Outstandingly developed points displayed and discussed in the appropriate way with thorough consideration of all objectives. Outstanding developed/ focused work with original, and realistic recommendations for the future.
29.75 pts
Excellent
Excellent level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation Excellently developed points displayed and discussed in the appropriate way with thorough consideration of all objectives Excellent developed/ focused work with original, and realistic recommendations for the future.
26.25 pts
Very good
Very good level of discussion/ analysis/ critical evaluation Very well-developed points displayed and discussed in the appropriate way with thorough consideration of the objectives Very developed/ focused work with original, and realistic recommendations for the future. Few points need further development or evaluation/comparison.
22.75 pts
Good
Good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation and appropriate recommendations around objectives More ideas/points could be addressed and developed further Realistic, well focused, and insightful recommendations
19.25 pts
Clear pass
Basic evidence of discussion and critical evaluation and some recommendations around objectives More development and comment needed on superficial points. Limited number of realistic and focused recommendations. More and original recommendations expected. If you wish to develop your work the following guide may be useful: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/pages/critical-analysis-and-critical-evaluation
15.75 pts
Marginal fail
Limited evidence of discussion or critical evaluation and/or recommendations. Development and comment needed rather than description. Poorly focused recommendations, lacking originality. You must use the following guide to develop your work before resubmission: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/pages/critical-analysis-and-critical-evaluation
10.5 pts
Clear fail
Lacking adequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation and recommendations. Too anecdotal or descriptive. Predetermined recommendations, lacking in originality and quantity. More, better focused, and realistic recommendations required. You must book a 121 support session with CASE: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
3.5 pts
Nothingof merit
No evidence of appropriate discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation and/or recommendations. ou must book a 121 support session with CASE, brining this feedback with you: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
/ 35 pts
Structure and quality of presentation [10%]
10 pts
Outstanding
Outstanding construction of the presentation with very high quality and creative materials . Outstandingly in their design and use of alternative media, creating an outstanding audience friendly presentation. Outstanding sequencing and technological application in its planning and organisation Outstanding sequencing and technological application in its planning and organisation No errors in Harvard Referencing
8.5 pts
Excellent
Excellent construction of the presentation with high quality and creative materials. Excellent in their design and use of alternative media, creating an excellent audience friendly presentation. Excellent sequencing and technological application in its planning and organisation. No errors in Harvard Referencing
7.5 pts
Very good
Very Good construction of the presentation with excellent quality and creative materials. Very effective in their design and use of alternative media, creating a very good audience friendly presentation. Very good sequencing and technological application in its planning and organisation. Few, minor errors in Harvard Referencing
6.5 pts
Good
Good construction of the presentation, providing a logical sequence and storyline. Good quality of the materials, with a few areas of overcrowding or lesser clarity. Effective in their design and use of alternative media, creating a good audience friendly presentation. Good application of technological application in its planning and organisation. Few errors in Harvard Referencing
5.5 pts
Clear pass
Satisfactory but basic construction derived from a basic construction and logical sequence to the presentation. Fulfils the basic requirements and would benefit from further identification of issues to be identified. Basic use of the technology and media, with some creativity and generally an audience friendly presentation. Could display too much creativity, thus causing overcrowding. Minor and persistent errors in Harvard Referencing
4.5 pts
Marginal fail
Weak construction derived from an illogical sequence and a presentation that does not display the required focus nor requirements. Shows basic requirements and elements of creativity in its design, with inappropriate use of technology. The presentation lacks audience friendliness, and some key issues are missing. Regular and persistent errors in Harvard referencing The following guides must be used to help guide your next submission: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/pages/academic-writing
3 pts
Clear fail
Inadequate construction derived from an illogical sequence, poor focus, and inappropriate technological application. The presentation lacks the required flow and presentation, causing confusion and an unfriendly audience presentation. The key issues required are not identified. Serious errors in Harvard referencing You must book a 121 support session with CASE brining with your this feedback: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
1 pts
Nothing of merit
Nothing of merit in terms of the planning and construction of the presentation, resulting in a confused, inappropriate and irrelevant content. Lacks any form of appropriate design, creativity, or suitable technological application. Lack Harvard Referencing. You must book a 121 support session with CASE brining with your this feedback: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
/ 10 pts
Communication and presentation skills [10%]
10 pts
Outstanding
Outstanding: communication skills. Extremely articulate and fluent, with intonations and language is crystal clear, creating a highly animated delivery. The written language is crystal clear, with outstanding logical progression, concise and appropriate without any grammatical and errors. The presentation is delivered to the exact time scale, showing a very well-rehearsed delivery and outstanding command and insight into the subject matter, shown through the outstanding depth and breadth of content
8.5 pts
Excellent
Excellent communication skills. Extremely articulate and fluent, with intonations and language is extremely clear, creating a highly animated delivery. The written language is extremely clear, with excellent logical progression, concise and appropriate without any grammatical errors. The presentation is delivered to the exact time scale, showing a very well-rehearsed delivery and excellent command and insight into the subject matter, shown through the excellent depth and breadth of content
7.5 pts
Very good
Very Good communication skills. Very articulate and fluent with very good intonations, creating an animated delivery. The written language is very clear and appropriate with logical progression, without grammatical errors. The presentation is delivered to time, showing a well-rehearsed delivery, with very good command and insight into the subject matter, shown through very good depth and breadth of understanding.
6.5 pts
Good
Good, clear communication skills. Articulate, fluent and creating an interesting delivery. The written language is good with mainly logical progression of thoughts but with some grammatical errors/hesitations /mistakes. The presentation is delivered within the required time scale, showing rehearsal. Good command and insight into the subject matter, shown through good depth and breadth of understanding.
5.5 pts
Clear pass
Basic appropriate communication skills in evidence but not always clearly expressed in terms of correct grammar or use of words or delivery. Written language is satisfactory with several grammatical errors/hesitations/mistakes. The presentation is delivered earlier into the time frame, showing some rehearsal. Satisfactory command and insight into the subject matter, shown through satisfactory depth and breadth of understanding.
4.5 pts
Marginal fail
Weak communication skills in evidence and not clearly expressed in terms of correct grammar or use of words or delivery. Written language is weak with several grammatical errors/hesitations/mistakes. The presentation is delivered short of the required time frame, showing lack of rehearsal. Unsatisfactory command and insight into the subject matter, shown through unsatisfactory depth and breadth of understanding. You must use the following guide to help you with your resubmission: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/pages/presentations
3 pts
Clear fail
Inadequate communication skills. Very poor use of language, little fluency, or logical progression of thought. Rambling speaking style. Written language is weak with many grammatical errors/hesitations/mistakes. Several referencing errors evident. The presentation is delivered well short of the required time frame, showing distinct lack of rehearsal. Lack of command and insight into the subject matter, shown through inadequate depth and breadth of understanding. You must book a 121 support session with CASE bringing with you this feedback: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
1 pts
Nothing of merit
Unsatisfactory, incomprehensible incomplete or inappropriate communication. Unsatisfactory and incomprehensible written language with many grammatical and referencing errors. The presentation is too short and a complete lack of command, insight and understanding of the subject matter. You must book a 121 support session with CASE bringing with you this feedback: https://herts.instructure.com/courses/104807/files/6317181?module_item_id=2802084
/ 10 pts
Total points: 0
Attachments:
