MED7366 Assessment No. 1 [ Research Plan ]
| Question # 48884 | Writing | 2 years ago |
|---|
| $30 |
|---|
![MED7366 Assessment No. 1 [ Research Plan ]](https://www.studyfull.com/storage/profile-pics/default-avatar/default-13.png)
Assessment Brief Details
Module Title: Research in Practice
Module Leader: Ellie Tomsett Credit Value: 20
Module Code: MED7366 Occurrence: A
Academic Year: 2023/4 Semester: S1
Assessment No.: 1
This Assessment accounts for 30% of the overall assessment for the module.
Assessment Title
Research Plan
Core Task
For this assessment you must develop a research question relevant to your field of study. You must then justify why research into this question will be useful for the field and/or you and your professional ambitions. Lastly you must identify existing academic and industry literature that will help you research the question you have developed.
You must provide the following as part of your written submission:
1) A finalised research question relevant to your field of study.
2)
A
justification of the research question (why it is relevant/ useful to explore
both for your area and you personally)
3) A correctly formatted reference list of between 10 and 15 pieces of academic and industry literature relevant to the topic.
1500 words (+/- 10%)
Where to find additional guidance for this task
We will launch this assessment live in the class, where you can ask questions about the tasks, and extra guidance will be found on Moodle. You will be asked to propose your question to the module leader for sign off in advance of submission so we can check you are researching in an area relevant to your field of study. The module leader has weekly tutorial slots available so you can book in to discuss your ideas before submission.
Submission date
09/11/2023
Submission details
· Upload your assignment to the designated assignment submission point on Moodle by 3pm on the submission date, using the coversheet provided.
· Submit work in Word (.docx) format.
· Work submitted late is subject to penalties, which are set out in the academic regulations. If you think you might struggle to meet your assessment deadline you should read the University’s procedure for extenuating circumstances or speak to your Module Leader or Student Success Adviser.
· About cheating and plagiarism: You are reminded of the University regulations on cheating. Except where the assessment is group-based, the final piece of work which is submitted must be your own work. Close similarity between submissions is likely to lead to an investigation for cheating.
Feedback date
07/12/2023
Marking Criteria
Learning Outcome1: Critically evaluate current debates and
problems in your chosen area of investigation
Criterion 1 Demonstrate critical engagement with current debates and problems in your area of research and practice (LO1)
0%-29%
30%-39%
40%-49%
50%-59%
60%-69%
70%-79%
80%-89%
90%-100%
No evidence of engagement with current debates within the student’s area of expertise within media.
Little evidence of engagement with current debates within the student’s area of expertise within media.
Cursory evidence of engagement with current debates within the student’s area of expertise within media.
Evidence
of a developing critical understanding of current debates within the
student’s area of expertise within media.
Evidence of a consistent and solid critical understanding of current debates within the student’s area of expertise within media.
Evidence of a well-developed critical understanding of current debates within the student’s area of expertise within media.
Evidence of a sophisticated critical understanding of current debates within the student’s area of expertise within media.
Evidence of critical understanding commensurate with the most accomplished MA work across research and professional practice agendas.
No justification for the study.
Insufficient justification for the study.
Basic justification for the study.
Good justification for the study.
Very good justification for the study.
Excellent justification for the study.
Excellent justification for the study.
Excellent justification for the study.
Criterion 2 Success in selecting
appropriate texts and appropriate presentation of the research plan including adherence
to academic conventions such referencing (LO1)
0%-29%
30%-39%
40%-49%
50%-59%
60%-69%
70%-79%
80%-89%
90%-100%
No relevant sources identified.
Insufficient or inappropriate academic and industry sources identified.
Limited appropriate academic and industry sources identified.
A sufficient but limited range of appropriate academic and industry sources identified.
A good range of appropriate academic and industry sources identified.
An excellent range of appropriate academic and industry sources identified. Demonstrating strong research skills in locating sources.
An excellent range of academic and industry sources identified. Demonstrating significant research skills in locating highly relevant sources.
An excellent range of academic and industry sources identified. Demonstrating sophisticated and thorough research skills in locating highly relevant sources.
Work is presented very poorly.
Work is presented poorly.
Work is broadly in line with academic standards at MA level.
Work is presented in line with academic standards at MA level.
Work is presented in line with academic standards at MA level.
Work is presented in line with academic standards at MA level.
Work is presented in line with academic standards at MA level.
Work is presented in line with academic standards at MA level.
Contains significant spelling, grammar, and presentational issues.
Contains many spelling, grammar, and presentational issues.
Contains some spelling, grammar, and presentational issues.
Contains few spelling, grammar, and presentational issues.
Contains no spelling, grammar and presentational issues and is articulated clearly.
Contains no errors and displays high level writing skills.
Contains no errors and displays very high-level writing skills.
Contains no errors and displays an excellent level of writing skills.
Identified literature is not correctly formatted in line with BCU referencing guidance.
Identified literature is not correctly formatted in line with BCU referencing guidance.
An attempt has been made to format in line with BCU referencing guidance, but some significant errors remain.
An attempt has been made to format in line with BCU referencing guidance, but few errors remain.
All sources have been formatted in line with BCU referencing guidance, but some minor errors remain.
All sources have been formatted in line with BCU referencing guidance with no errors.
All sources have been formatted in line with BCU referencing guidance with no errors.
All sources have been formatted in line with BCU referencing guidance with no errors.
Re-submission Assessment Brief
(ONLY required if you fail the
Assessment Brief above)
You should contact your Module Tutor before attempting this re-submission Assessment Brief
Assessment Title
Research Plan
Core Task
For this assessment you must develop a research question relevant to your field of study. You must then justify why research into this question will be useful for the field and/or you and your professional ambitions. Lastly you must identify existing academic and industry literature that will help you research the question you have developed.
You must provide the following as part of your written submission:
1) A finalised research question relevant to your field of study.
2)
A
justification of the research question (why it is relevant/ useful to explore
both for your area and you personally)
3) A correctly formatted reference list of between 10 and 15 pieces of academic or industry literature relevant to the topic.
1500 words (+/- 10%)
Where to find additional guidance for this task
The Moodle assessment area will contain additional guidance for completing this task. Please refer to materials used in classes where this task was launched (accessible on Moodle), the feedback you received on any failed submissions, and book in for tutor office hours to support your work as necessary.
Re-Submission date: 18/07/2024
Re-Submission details
· Upload your assignment to the designated assignment submission point on Moodle by 3pm on the submission date, using the coversheet provided.
· Submit work in Word (.docx) format.
· About cheating and plagiarism: You are reminded of the University regulations on cheating. Except where the assessment is group-based, the final piece of work which is submitted must be your own work. Close similarity between submissions is likely to lead to an investigation for cheating.
Feedback date: 15/08/2024
Attachments:
![MED7366 Assessment No. 1 [ Research Plan ]](https://www.studyfull.com/front-end/img/guarantee.png)
