DHI402 Digital Health Management ASSESSMENT 2 Analytical report[2000 words]
Question # 49352 | Writing | 5 months ago |
---|
$45 |
---|
DHI451_Assessment_#2_Brief_Evaluation Report_Module 8 Page 1 of 9
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title
DHI402 Digital Health Management Assessment
Analytical report Individual/Group
Individual Length
2000 words ±10% Learning Outcomes
This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes:
a) Critically analyse digital health management and information systems in Australian and global contexts.
b) Reflect on and apply the use of innovative information systems in digital health management.
c) Investigate and contrast legal frameworks and global guidelines for digital health management in Australia, with insights into social equity principles and diversity.
d) Investigate the effectiveness of a participatory health information system intervention in digital health management from a health practitioner perspective.
e) Critically analyse the role of health information managers and participatory approaches in digital health management.
f) Demonstrate inter- and intra-professional collaboration and communication in Australian digital health management practices. Submission
Due by 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 8. Weighting
40% Total Marks
100 marks
Assessment Task
In Assessment 2, you will critically analyse digital health management and health information management requirements in a healthcare setting, so as to recommend improvements. This analytical report should contain 2,000 words, excluding references.
DHI451_Assessment_#2_Brief_Evaluation Report_Module 8 Page 2 of 9
Context
This assessment aims to test your understanding of digital health management and health information flows within a health information system (HIS) from a health practitioner perspective. You will need to analyse the existing health information management system and digital tools that are being used in a healthcare facility, based on the case scenario provided.
The analytical skills and knowledge from this assessment will be transferable and useful in your future professional practice where you will need to analyse workflows and data flows, and propose relevant improvements for various stakeholders (i.e., managers, colleagues, patients).
Instructions
Background
You are a digital health management consultant in Australia, who has been engaged by a healthcare organisation to help them improve their current HIS and digital healthcare management practices. You need to provide the health facility with a report that:
• outlines the key areas of concern in their current systems and practices
• proposes recommendations.
The report should contain the following sections:
Section 1 – Introduction (100 words)
• Provide a brief introduction about the health facility based on your understanding of the case scenario and making reasonable assumptions, contextualising any Australian location.
Section 2 – Flowchart and Analysis of Health Information System (HIS) (500 words)
• You will create a visual flowchart that outlines the key stages of patient journey management. The flowchart should detail each of the stages based on the scenario.
Consider the following:
• How is health data collected?
• What health data elements are being collected at each stage?
• Which roles (individuals/groups) are involved in data generation, collection, processing and storage?
• Who are the users of the system?
• What are the sources of data?
• Who receives the health data generated?
• How is data privacy preserved in the current system?
• How is health data used/processed? Who are the individuals involved in this step?
• How is health data stored?
DHI451_Assessment_#2_Brief_Evaluation Report_Module 8 Page 3 of 9
• How is health data shared? Who has access to patient health information?
• What digital management tools are used to support the facility?
Section 3 – Gap Analysis (500 words)
In this section, report on the limitation and gaps within the current HIS. Consider the following:
• Privacy and security
• Data accuracy and timeliness
• Duplication of processes
• Data-sharing limitations
• Ease of use for users
Section 4 – Digital Health System Recommendations (500 words)
Recommend improvements to the overall HIS and digital health management practices to address the gaps that you identified. Consider the following:
• What is the role of users and health workers in facilitating the improvement? Hint: Focus on user participation and health worker involvement.
• What are the implications for integrating the facility into the Australian MyHealthRecord (myHR)? Hint: Focus on interoperability.
• What information from the HIS will flow into myHR and what are the implications? Hint: Focus on the privacy of health information.
Section 5 – Limitations, Risks and Conclusions (400 words)
• Describe the limitations of your recommendations, as well as potential risks in them. How would you minimise or alleviate the risks? Recommend steps. What other digital health solutions can you recommend in this scenario?
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA 7th Ed. style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
Submission Instructions
Submit your Report via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in the DHI402 Digital Health Management Blackboard portal. Your Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity
DHI451_Assessment_#2_Brief_Evaluation Report_Module 8 Page 4 of 9
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia’s Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.
SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 5 of 9
SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 6 of 9
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0–49% Pass (Functional) 50–64% Credit (Proficient) 65–74% Distinction (Advanced) 75–84% High Distinction (Exceptional) 85–100%
Knowledge and understanding of health information systems
25%
Demonstrated a limited understanding of health information systems.
• Neglected key processes in health information management.
• No understanding of key elements within the health data management environment demonstrated. Description of health data collection, storage, sharing, and data privacy and safety not provided.
Demonstrated a functional knowledge of health information systems.
• Identified the key processes in health information management.
• A limited understanding of the key elements within the health data management environment; missing description of health data collection, storage, sharing, and data privacy and safety.
Demonstrated proficient knowledge of health information systems.
• Clearly described and elaborated each step in the process of health information management.
• An understanding of the key elements within the health data management environment demonstrated, though description of health data collection, storage, sharing, and data privacy and safety lacked detail.
Demonstrated advanced knowledge of health information systems.
• Clearly described and elaborated each step in the process of health information management and identified key premises and personnel involved.
• An understanding of the key elements within the health data management environment, including clear descriptions of health data collection, storage, sharing, and data privacy and safety.
Demonstrated exceptional knowledge of health information systems.
• Elaborately analysed the processes, personnel involved, and data sharing and linkages across roles in health information management.
• A detailed understanding of the key elements within the health data management environment, with clear and detailed descriptions of health data collection, storage,
SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 7 of 9
sharing, and data privacy and safety.
Identification and analysis of gaps
25%
No clear identification of gaps present within the current health management system and key areas of concern are not discussed.
Limited identification of gaps present within the current health management system; describes key areas of concern, including privacy and security, data accuracy and timeliness, duplication of processes, data sharing limitations and ease of use for users.
Identification of gaps present within the current health management system; describes key areas of concern, including privacy and security, data accuracy and timeliness, duplication of processes, data sharing limitations and ease of use for users.
Identification of the gaps present within the current health management system, with an analysis of key areas of concern including privacy and security, data accuracy and timeliness, duplication of processes, data sharing limitations and ease of use for users.
Clear and accurate identification of gaps present within the current health management system, with a detailed analysis of key areas of concern including privacy and security, data accuracy and timeliness, duplication of processes, data sharing limitations and ease of use for users.
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge
30%
Proposed digital health solutions that demonstrated limited understanding of the capabilities of a digital-based health management system.
Provided generic recommendations which were unrelated to the risks identified.
Did not attempt to incorporate personal
Proposed digital health solutions that demonstrated basic understanding of the capabilities of a digital-based health management system.
Simple set of generic recommendations with very limited links between the risks identified and the solutions presented.
Proposed reasonable digital health solutions that demonstrated proficient understanding of the capabilities of a digital-based health management system.
Well-developed set of valid recommendations with unclear links between the risks identified and the solutions presented.
Proposed innovative digital health solutions that demonstrated a substantial understanding of the capabilities of a digital-based health management system.
Thoroughly developed set of relevant recommendations with potential links between the risks identified and the solutions presented.
Proposed innovative and effective digital health solutions that demonstrated a detailed understanding of the capabilities of a digital-based health management system.
Sophisticated set of best practice recommendations with clear links between the risks identified and the solutions presented.
SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 8 of 9
health information management system in the design.
Insufficiently analysed limitations and risks related to the proposed digital transformation of health management data.
Did not attempt to incorporate personal health information management system in the design.
Provided theoretical and non-specific risks which are not associated with the proposed digital transformation of health management data.
Attempted to incorporate personal health information management system in the design.
Identified a few potential but non-specific risks in the proposed digital transformation of health management data.
Incorporated some semblance of personal health information management system in the design.
Identified a wide range of potential and specific risks in the proposed digital transformation of health management data.
Incorporated personal and participatory health information management system in the design.
Provided an honest discussion of the potential and specific risks in the proposed digital transformation of health management data, including risk mitigation strategies.
Effective Communication (Written)
10%
Information presented lacks clarity
Specialised language and terminology are rarely or inaccurately used.
Meaning is repeatedly obscured by errors in the communication of ideas, including errors in structure, sequence, spelling, grammar, punctuation and/or the acknowledgment of sources.
Communicated in a readable manner that largely adheres to the given format.
Generally uses specialised language and terminology with accuracy.
Meaning is sometimes difficult to follow.
Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is not always clear and logical.
Some errors are evident in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation.
Communicated in a coherent and readable manner that adheres to the given format.
Accurately uses specialised language and terminology.
Meaning is easy to follow.
Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical.
Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation.
Communicated coherently and concisely in a manner that adheres to the given format.
Accurately uses a wide range of specialised language and terminology.
Engages reader’s interest.
Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and persuasive.
Spelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.
Communicated eloquently. Expressed meaning coherently, concisely and creatively within the given format.
Discerningly selects and precisely uses a wide range of specialised language and terminology.
Engages and sustains reader’s interest.
Information, arguments and evidence are insightful, persuasive and expertly presented.
SubjectCode_Assessment_#_Brief_AssesmentType_Module Due# Page 9 of 9
Spelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.
Correct citation of key resources and evidence
10%
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.
Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.
Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well-developed.
Referencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors.
Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas.
Referencing resembles APA, with occasional errors.
Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements.
Showed evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence.
APA referencing is free from errors.
Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements.
Showed evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence.
APA referencing is free from errors.