6LAW1049-0901-2025 - Jurisprudence Assignment [Presentation]
| Question # 50397 | Law | 2 months ago |
|---|
| $15 |
|---|
Important note: The assignment you submit on your canvas account must be your own work which you have planned and written independently. For further advice on academic integrity and/or how to use Turnitin, consult the LLB academic integrity page.
Use of AI: the student is expressly permitted to use AI tools in the creation of content for their work and to proofread their work (alternatively, they can use a proofreader or non-GenAI proofreading service).
Summative CW 2 – Presentation and Q&A 100% of final grade, to be held around or on the 20th January 2026.
Question:
In your presentation come to a reasoned conclusion about the difference between law and morality, critically evaluating this quote:
“The Third Reich had a legal system. Apartheid South Africa had a legal system. It is true that not only these societies but every society has some unjust laws. These laws and legal systems are imperfect because, unless rights and duties mean something different in law and morality, laws and legal systems claim to be morally in order.” Tony Honore, ‘The Necessary Connection Between Law and Morality’ [2002] 22 (3) OJLS 489
The presentation should last NO MORE than 8 minutes. Marks will be deducted for grossly over running. The Q&A session will last about the same time. During this time the tutor will critically engage with your argument.
Grading criteria Juris.docxDownload Grading criteria Juris.docx
Attachments: