Instructions for Coursework 2: Written Counter-Argument to AI-Generated Output

Worth: 60% of your final grade. Your essay should be a maximum of 1500 words, excluding footnotes and bibliography. 

Due Date: Monday, 20 April 2026 at 12:00 PM (noon)

Question:

Please find the question for the LLB Copyright and AI CW2 assignment here: LLB Copyright and AI Coursework 2 - Appraisal of AI-Generated Output.docxDownload LLB Copyright and AI Coursework 2 - Appraisal of AI-Generated Output.docx

Suggested Reading:

The suggested reading list for Coursework 2 is available here: Copyright and AI CW2 suggested reading.odtDownload Copyright and AI CW2 suggested reading.odt

Feel free to explore resources beyond this list to enhance your research.

Additional Useful Material:

To assist you in completing CW2, you may find the following material helpful: Copyright and AI CW2 Supporting Material.pptxDownload Copyright and AI CW2 Supporting Material.pptx

Permitted Use of AI Tools:

You are encouraged to use AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, CoPilot) for research, planning, and content creation, including proofreading. However, you must adhere to the University's academic integrity policies (UPR 14 App3) and ethical guidelines for AI use. Specifically:

1. Transparency: You must clearly identify all portions of your assignment that used AI (refer to https://herts.instructure.com/courses/61421/pages/evaluating-generative-ai-tools?module)
2. Acknowledgement: You must properly acknowledge AI-generated material (refer to https://www-citethemrightonline-com.ezproxy.herts.ac.uk/sourcetype?docid=b-9781350928022&tocid=b-9781350928022-46Links to an external site.). For AI-generated content, clearly state the AI model used (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini), the version (if known), and the date of your query. Clearly identify which portions of your presentation use AI-generated material.
3. Verification: You must critically assess and verify the accuracy of all AI-generated information. Do not rely on AI for factual statements without independent verification.
4. Declaration: You must declare your AI usage and the extent of its use, as per the University's AI usage policy (i.e., declare all AI use, specifying tool/model and purpose).

Examples:

• "Used [AI tool/model] for grammar/spelling proofreading."
• "Used [AI tool/model] for research topic brainstorming."
• "Used [AI tool/model] to summarize [case name]."

Include as a final statement before bibliography.

Unauthorised use of AI-generated material is considered academic misconduct.

Ethical Guidelines for AI Use:

1. Be transparent about AI use, distinguishing between human-generated and AI-generated content.
2. Verify the accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness of AI-generated information.
3. Address potential biases and limitations of AI tools (e.g., citation errors, implicit bias).
4. Use AI responsibly, adhering to University policies and ethical guidelines, including intellectual property and data protection.

Present a well-supported counter-argument to the AI's output in a 1500-word reflective essay. Your essay should be a maximum of 1500 words. This excludes footnotes and bibliography. Your analysis and counter-argument must be supported by relevant primary and secondary legal sources, including legislation, case law, academic and practitioner opinions, government and industry reports, etc. Your essay should address the following aspects:

• Accuracy: Evaluate the factual correctness and reliability of the information presented by the AI.
• Potential Biases: Identify any inherent biases or limitations in the AI's output.
• Knowledge Gaps: Assess areas where the AI demonstrates incomplete or outdated knowledge.
• Alternative Perspectives: Explore different viewpoints or interpretations the AI may have overlooked.
• Counter-Argument: Develop a clear and compelling counter-argument, supported by evidence and analysis, that challenges the AI’s output. This should form the core of your essay.
• Reflection: Reflect on the process of engaging with the AI-generated content. Consider your own biases, assumptions, and learning throughout the process.

Referencing Requirements (OSCOLA)

Your essay must adhere strictly to OSCOLA referencing conventions. This includes:

• Comprehensive Footnotes: All sources, including legal materials (legislation, case law, academic and practitioner opinions), government and industry reports, news articles, and any other relevant information, must be cited in footnotes.
• Complete Bibliography: A bibliography listing all cited sources is required.
• For detailed OSCOLA guidance, refer to the official resource: https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/migrated/oscola_4th_edn_hart_2012.pdfLinks to an external site. 

Referencing Generative AI in OSCOLA:

• Cite AI output as: AI Name (Date of Request).
  • Example: ChatGPT (24 March 2025).
• Place this citation within a footnote.
• Critically verify all AI-generated content for accuracy.
• Be aware that OSCOLA guidelines for generative AI are evolving; regularly consult the latest guidance.

Essay Structure:

Your essay should have a clear and logical structure, including an introduction, body paragraphs developing your analysis and counter-argument, and a conclusion. The reflective element should be integrated throughout the essay, not confined to a separate section.

Important Information:

• Please refer to the Level 6 Assessment Booklet for important information relating to your submission:

LLB Assessment Template.docx

• “NB: PLEASE ENSURE YOU HAVE VIEWED VIDEO/QUIZ IN LINK BELOW PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF YOUR COURSEWORK:

 Academic Conduct Offences Explained ”